I’ve been out of the hospital from my pneumonia infection for about a month. My mind is happy about that, but my skin is not. About a week after I got home I broke out in a horrendous rash that apparently was from the Bactrim antibiotic I was taking. So, I went back to the original antibiotic I used to prevent this pneumonia. We thought that would be the end of the rash since it disappeared for a bit, but about a week ago it returned. Not on my torso as in the first time, but all over my arms, legs and face. So, back to the drawing board to figure this out…
I’ve had two appointments with Dr. G in the past few weeks trying to figure out next steps. The pneumonia and now the rash has thrown a wrench into our plans. Thankfully he feels that I have not lost my chances with my infusion since I had to delay it when in the hospital. I was able to get quickly scheduled and medication delivered and I had an infusion at the end of January. However, he is concerned this new rash could be related to the infusion. I don’t think so because I had 2 infusions in December without a rash, but he says it can be delayed. So, to figure this out we are going to get through the next week or so with the antibiotic and once I’m off of steroids I can stop it. If the rash doesn’t return (it’s getting better over time) then we know it was the antibiotic. If I have my next infusion and it returns, we have a problem.
In addition to this we have decided not to start the Rinvoq. This way we can get off the antibiotic (if I’m on 2 Crohn’s drugs I have to be on it) and will be on a much safer path with treatment given the reoccurrence of pneumonia risk. I’m a bit apprehensive given how sick I was last fall to go down to one treatment, but also ok with it. One treatment would really be nice. If at any time my symptoms worsen we have a very low threshold to go back to the Rinvoq.
As if all of this isn’t enough for me I have also been having quite a few discussions with my liver doctor, Dr. B. If you remember, back in the fall the stricture in my common bile duct grew a bit and my CA 19-9 level ticked up a bit. He thought about doing an ERCP procedure to investigate further, but Dr. G stated I was too sick to do that last fall. ERCP’s are pretty invasive and come with a high chance of complications. We decided if the CA 19-9 level increased again in January we would do the ERCP. Well, it did. I was prepared to do the ERCP and once again Dr. G says I am too sick to do this procedure.I’m not very comfortable waiting given it seemed important we investigate this last fall. Dr. B says the level I’m at is not worrisome yet. Yet!? Can we please just figure this out and take action if appropriate before it becomes worrisome? It took so many messages and finally a conversation with Dr. G that we firmed our plan. Dr. G tried to talk me off the ledge with worry, but he did also say that if it were him, he’d want to know too. He stressed his worry though and my bad luck with things lately. I am not far out of an infection and not back on a treatment plan he feels comfortable with. He just doesn’t want me to get more sick and head into a worse flare with such an invasive procedure. I get that and I appreciate his concern. In the end, the plan agreed upon by all of us is that I will repeat the CA 19-9 test at the end of February and if it has gone up again we will do the ERCP whether I’m sick or not. Let’s be honest, I’m never not sick.
This is all a bit much for me, but I’m taking it day by day and really hoping that things finally settle down a bit. If I could go two weeks without an appointment or test I would be thrilled! The good news is the lungs allowed me to get back on the slopes to ski! The mountains are my happy place where I can clear my head. Good for the soul.